I’m not a Luddite, but I don’t consider myself a gadget guy, either. I have a smart phone, but most of the time, it’s a glorified pocket watch. I don’t text, I am always forgetting that the thing has a camera on it, and even though it can play music, I don’t use it for that. (I am of the tribe that believes music needs to be in the air and that the perpetual wearing of earbuds is one of the more annoying affectations of the 21st century; besides, they’re uncomfortable.) My phone has a QWERTY keyboard because I was unfit for polite society when I tried to do e-mail and Facebook with the 10-key pad. But I barely do e-mail or Facebook on my phone often enough to justify what the capability costs every month. Nevertheless, just as I found myself intrigued by the iPhone, I am similarly intrigued by the iPad.
Amidst all the breathless commentary on what the thing can do, few people have bothered to notice what it can’t do—pick up radio stations. As recently as 15 or 20 years ago, if you’d designed the sort of all-everything device the iPad appears to be, it almost certainly would have included a tuner. Although you can get an iPhone app that allow you to listen to satellite radio, and Clear Channel has its own app that allows a user to stream its radio stations, top-down, we-program-and-you-listen radio is pretty much an afterthought in the new media world. Jerry Del Colliano has been preaching this for a long time, and he wrote about it again this week, before the iPad unveiling and after. Del Colliano maintains that radio has to reinvent itself for an on-demand world or risk going the way of high-button shoes and buggy whips. Key stat: Only about three percent of terrestrial radio listening is coming from Internet streams.
Since this is Friday and I’m used to putting up a Top Five here on Fridays, let’s call those Del Colliano links #1.
2. What’s most tragic about the consolidation-driven job losses in the radio biz is that they take out the kind of people the industry was built on and can’t do without. Like this one—who’s nobody famous, but didn’t have to be.
3. Not long after I discovered Tom Nawrocki’s terrific One Poor Correspondent, he decided to 86 it. But I’m glad to report that Tom’s back and blogging with a couple of cohorts at Debris Slide, so start reading it already.
4. I’ve had a long Internet relationship with Jeff at AM, Then FM, going back to an e-mailed Packers newsletter he published nearly 15 years ago. I’ve always dug his economical style. Sometimes, a few words is all it takes—as in his tribute to a friend and colleague who died suddenly this week at age 38. That’s writing. What I do here is just typing.
5. And because I don’t want to leave you without a record chart to conjure with over the weekend, check this one from WYSL in Buffalo dated January 26, 1976, particularly the album chart. There were giants in the earth in those days: the bazillion-selling greatest hits albums from America and Chicago, the Alive album from KISS, Still Crazy After All These Years, and Bob Dylan’s Desire atop the chart. It was on its way to Number One in Billboard, too, and would be the last Dylan album to reach Number One on the Billboard album chart until Modern Times in 2006. Although “Hurricane” was the bigger single, “Mozambique” would get to Number 54 on the Hot 100 later in the spring of 1976. According to the Wikipedia entry for the album, “Mozambique” came about when Dylan and collaborator Jacques Levy tried to see how many rhymes they could create for the syllable -ique.
